Skip to main content

Table 3 CMR practice type, volumes, and location

From: Worldwide variation in cardiovascular magnetic resonance practice models

CMR practice

Type of institution

n = 1014

%

University/academic hospital

695

69

Community/non-academic hospital

249

25

Government institution/public assistance

42

4

Research institution

28

3

The department responsible for the scanner

n = 985

%

Radiology

608

62

Cardiology

211

21

Shared

166

17

Location of CMR Program

n = 606

%

Hospital

522

86

Imaging center/outpatient facility

61

10

Both

23

4

Percentage of time of MR dedicated to CMR

n = 333

%

0–25%

189

57

26–50%

57

17

51–75%

15

5

 > 75%

13

4

Dedicated scanner

59

18

Service area size (inhabitants)

n = 546

%

 > 1 million

232

42

 > 500,000–1 million

121

22

 > 250,000–500,000

103

19

100,000–250,000

68

12

 < 100,000

22

4

Clinical CMR studies performed per year

n = 917

%

 < 100

119

13

101–300

193

21

301–500

161

18

501–1000

151

16

1001–2000

183

20

2001–3000

57

6

 > 3000

53

6

  1. This table shows various aspects of respondents’ CMR practice type, volumes, and location. The CMR sample size of each category is different since not all responders answered all questions. CMR cardiovascular magnetic resonance