Skip to main content

Table 5 Characteristics compared over serial CMR

From: Comprehensive cardiac magnetic resonance T1, T2, and extracellular volume mapping to define Duchenne cardiomyopathy

 

CMR 1 vs 2

CMR 1 vs 3

Left ventricular ejection fraction (%)

2.6 ± 0.5

 < 0.001

4.5 ± 0.8

 < 0.001

Indexed LV end diastolic volume (ml/m2)

− 0.98 ± 1.4

0.484

− 3.1 ± 1.8

0.093

Indexed LV systolic volume (ml/m2)

− 2.3 ± 0.9

0.014

− 4.3 ± 1.0

 < 0.001

LV mass indexed (g/m2)

3.3 ± 1.0

0.003

6.7 ± 1.3

 < 0.001

Right ventricular ejection fraction (%)

1.3 ± 0.9

0.163

1.7 ± 0.9

0.079

Basal strain (%)

− 0.82 ± 0.5

0.095

− 0.82 ± 0.5

0.115

Mid strain (%)

− 0.47 ± 0.5

0.371

− 0.81 ± 0.5

0.115

Apical strain (%)

− 0.41 ± 0.6

0.463

− 0.25 ± 0.6

0.700

Global base native T1 (ms)

2 ± 9

0.780

10 ± 10

0.325

Global mid native T1 (ms)

20 ± 12

0.107

17 ± 12

0.164

Global apex native T1 (ms)

12 ± 15

0.412

46 ± 22

0.048

Global base T2 (ms)

− 1.9 ± 0.5

 < 0.001

− 1.0 ± 0.5

0.062

Global mid T2 (ms)

− 1.6 ± 0.4

 < 0.001

− 1.5 ± 0.7

0.029

Global apex T2 (ms)

− 1.7 ± 0.6

0.011

− 3.2 ± 1.4

0.025

Global base ECV (%)

− 0.8 ± 0.6

0.198

− 0.7 ± 0.7

0.338

Global mid ECV (%)

− 0.2 ± 0.8

0.728

0.0 ± 0.9

0.997

Global apex ECV (%)

0.2 ± 0.8

0.782

0.5 ± 1.0

0.613

  1. Mean difference and standard error between serial CMR and tissue characterization parameter measurements. The first row in the cell is the mean difference with positive values indicating a higher value measured with CMR1 than the compared study. The second row is the p-value. ECV extracellular volume fraction, LV left ventricle, RV right ventricle