Skip to main content

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of the study cohort. Per-protocol dataset with full strain assessment

From: Effect of etelcalcetide versus alfacalcidol on left ventricular function and feature-tracking cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in hemodialysis—a post-hoc analysis of a randomized, controlled trial

 

Total

ALFA

ETEL

p-value

 

N = 48

N = 23

N = 25

 

Age

62 (11)

61 (7)

62 (13)

0.88

Male sex

75%

83%

68%

0.24

Diabetes

46%

48%

44%

0.79

Hypertension

98%

96%

100%

0.29

Hyperlipidemia

52%

52%

52%

0.99

Coronary artery disease

58%

70%

48%

0.13

Heart failure

27%

22%

32%

0.42

Peripheral arterial disease

21%

22%

20%

0.88

Cause of ESRD

   

0.59

 Diabetic nephropathy

27%

35%

20%

 

 Hypertensive nephropathy

15%

13%

16%

 

 Vascular nephropathy

19%

17%

20%

 

 Polycystic kidney disease

12%

17%

8%

 

 Glomerulonephritis

10%

9%

12%

 

 Other kidney disease

17%

9%

24%

 

 Months on dialysis

11 (10)

12 (11)

10 (9)

0.48

 Dialysis access (fistula)

77%

83%

72%

0.38

Baseline CMR parameters

 LVEF

51 (9)

50 (10)

53 (7)

0.39

 LV CI

3.3 (0.8)

3.3 (0.9)

3.3 (0.6)

0.75

 LV GLS

− 21 (5)

− 21 (5)

− 22 (4)

0.86

 LV GCS

− 33 (8)

− 32 (8)

− 33 (7)

0.39

 LV GRS

− 22 (6)

− 21 (7)

− 23 (4)

0.45

 RV GLS

− 24 (6)

− 23 (6)

− 24 (6)

0.56

 LA EF

43 (14)

41 (14)

44 (13)

0.49

 LA GLS

23 (13)

22 (16)

24 (11)

0.60

 LA GCS

23 (11)

21 (10)

25 (11)

0.21

 T1 time (ms)

1018 (40)

1023 (43)

1014 (40)

0.47

 T2 time (ms)

50 (2.5)

50 (3.0)

50 (2.0)

0.92

  1. ALFA alfacalcidol; CI cardiac index; CMR cardiac magnetic resonance imaging; EDV end-diastolic volume; EF ejection fraction; ESRD end-stage renal disease; ETEL Etelcalcetide; GCS global circumferential strain; GLS global longitudinal strain; GRS: global radial strain; LA: left atrial; LV: left ventricle; RV: right ventricle